DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Opel Campo vs 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
CampoModelLancer
1992Model year1992
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

23,1 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
135 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
94 HPPower60 HP
170 NmTorque113 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13

Dimensions

4980 mmLength4115 mm
1690 mmWidth1635 mm
1710 mmHeight1415 mm
—Weight1000 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Opel Campo and 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…