2003 • Opel
Astra
Opel Astra 2.0 16V T OPC (200 Hp) 2003Overall Score68.5/100
2003 Opel Astra vs 2003 Mazda Atenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2003Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel AstraSpecificationMazda Atenza
OpelMakeMazda
AstraModelAtenza
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel AstraSpecificationMazda Atenza
7,8 s0–100 km/h—
231 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
200 HPPower178 HP
250 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel AstraSpecificationMazda Atenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel AstraSpecificationMazda Atenza
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/40 ZR 17Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel AstraSpecificationMazda Atenza
4288 mmLength4745 mm
1710 mmWidth1780 mm
1510 mmHeight1440 mm
1340 KgWeight1340 Kg
2611 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Opel Astra and 2003 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…