1990 • Audi
Coupe
Audi Coupe 2.0 E (113 Hp) 1990Overall Score58.25/100
1990 Audi Coupe vs 1990 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 1.8i (110 Hp) 1990Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Bluebird
AudiMakeNissan
CoupeModelBluebird
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Bluebird
10,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1838 cc
113 HPPower110 HP
170 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Bluebird
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Bluebird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size—
Dimensions
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Bluebird
4366 mmLength4520 mm
1716 mmWidth1690 mm
1370 mmHeight1375 mm
1130 KgWeight—
2556 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi Coupe and 1990 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…