1990 • Audi
Coupe
Audi Coupe 2.0 20V (160 Hp) 1990Overall Score66.5/100
1990 Audi Coupe vs 1991 Mazda Cronos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1991 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0i V6 24V (160 Hp) 1991Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CoupeSpecificationMazda Cronos
AudiMakeMazda
CoupeModelCronos
1990Model year1991
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Audi CoupeSpecificationMazda Cronos
8,5 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
160 HPPower160 HP
195 NmTorque180 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CoupeSpecificationMazda Cronos
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CoupeSpecificationMazda Cronos
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi CoupeSpecificationMazda Cronos
4366 mmLength4695 mm
1716 mmWidth1770 mm
1370 mmHeight1400 mm
1350 KgWeight1220 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi Coupe and 1991 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…