1995 • Audi
Coupe
Audi Coupe 2.0 16V (140 Hp) 1995Overall Score63.5/100
1995 Audi Coupe vs 1995 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 1.8 i 16V GS (126 Hp) 1995Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi FTO
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CoupeSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
AudiMakeMitsubishi
CoupeModelFTO
1995Model year1995
CoupeBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Audi CoupeSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
207 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
140 HPPower126 HP
185 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CoupeSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8 ltAverage consumption17,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CoupeSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi CoupeSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
4366 mmLength4320 mm
1716 mmWidth1735 mm
1375 mmHeight1300 mm
1270 KgWeight1100 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Audi Coupe and 1995 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…