DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Astra vs 1996 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRover
AstraModelMini MK
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
164 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1700 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
68 HPPower63 HP
132 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R13 82T; 175/65 R14 82TTyre size145/70 R12 Q
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4051 mmLength3100 mm
1696 mmWidth1440 mm
1410 mmHeight1351 mm
1050/1070 KgWeight700 Kg
2517 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Astra and 1996 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…