DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Astra vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel AstraSpecificationMazda 323
OpelMakeMazda
AstraModel323
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Opel AstraSpecificationMazda 323
11,5 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
101 HPPower82 HP
148 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel AstraSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel AstraSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 82HTyre size185/65 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel AstraSpecificationMazda 323
4051 mmLength4340 mm
1696 mmWidth1710 mm
1410 mmHeight1420 mm
1045/1065 KgWeight1170 Kg
2517 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Astra and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…