DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Opel Astra vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10 points.

57.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
AstraModelClio
2011Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
188 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
115 HPPower98 HP
155 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4419 mmLength3773 mm
1814 mmWidth1640 mm
1510 mmHeight1417 mm
1298 KgWeight965 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Opel Astra and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…