1985 • Opel
Ascona
Opel Ascona 1.8i (115 Hp) 1985Overall Score53.25/100
1985 Opel Ascona vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1990Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Opel Ascona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel AsconaSpecificationGeo Storm
OpelMakeGeo
AsconaModelStorm
1985Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Opel AsconaSpecificationGeo Storm
10,5 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
187 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
151 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel AsconaSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel AsconaSpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel AsconaSpecificationGeo Storm
4366 mmLength4150 mm
1668 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1300 mm
1010 KgWeight1010 Kg
2574 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1985 Opel Ascona and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…