DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1983 Opel Ascona vs 1988 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel AsconaSpecificationAudi 90
OpelMakeAudi
AsconaModel90
1983Model year1988
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel AsconaSpecificationAudi 90
10,5 s0–100 km/h14,6 s
187 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
115 HPPower80 HP
151 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel AsconaSpecificationAudi 90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel AsconaSpecificationAudi 90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel AsconaSpecificationAudi 90
4366 mmLength4393 mm
1668 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1397 mm
1010 KgWeight1090 Kg
2574 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1983 Opel Ascona and 1988 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…