DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi Cabriolet vs 1996 Mazda Clef Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Clef

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
CabrioletModelClef
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h—
209 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2598 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower200 HP
225 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 91 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4670 mm
1716 mmWidth1750 mm
1379 mmHeight1400 mm
1455 KgWeight1250 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi Cabriolet and 1996 Mazda Clef approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Clef leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…