DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1985 Opel Ascona vs 1990 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRover
AsconaModelMini MK
1985Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/4Doors3

Performance

17,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
150 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1297 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
60 HPPower61 HP
94 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size145/70 R12

Dimensions

4366 mmLength3050 mm
1668 mmWidth1410 mm
1395 mmHeight1350 mm
920 KgWeight695 Kg
2574 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1985 Opel Ascona and 1990 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…