DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Opel Antara vs 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
AntaraModelEclipse
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2405 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
150 HPPower162 HP
220 NmTorque217 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength—
1850 mmWidth—
1704 mmHeight—
2707 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Opel Antara and 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…