DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Opel Antara vs 2009 Great Wall Deer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeGreat Wall
AntaraModelDeer
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2405 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
150 HPPower105 HP
220 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption14 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4870 mm
1850 mmWidth1750 mm
1704 mmHeight1800 mm
—Weight1575 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Opel Antara and 2009 Great Wall Deer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…