DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Antara vs 2013 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda 6
OpelMakeMazda
AntaraModel6
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda 6
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
186 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
167 HPPower163 HP
230 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda 6
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda 6
4596 mmLength4765 mm
1850 mmWidth1795 mm
1761 mmHeight1490 mm
—Weight1575 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Antara and 2013 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…