DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Opel Antara vs 2014 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
AntaraModelCascada
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
191 km/hTop speed212 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
184 HPPower165 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank56 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4596 mmLength4696 mm
1850 mmWidth1839 mm
1761 mmHeight1443 mm
—Weight1701-1816 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Opel Antara and 2014 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…