1998 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1998Overall Score58.25/100
1998 Audi Cabriolet vs 1998 Mazda Bongo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.0 (105 Hp) 1998Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Bongo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMazda Bongo
AudiMakeMazda
CabrioletModelBongo
1998Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats—
2Doors4
Performance
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMazda Bongo
12,9 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
165 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMazda Bongo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMazda Bongo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R15; 215/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMazda Bongo
4366 mmLength4585 mm
1716 mmWidth1690 mm
1379 mmHeight1960 mm
1350 KgWeight—
2556 mmWheelbase2920 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Audi Cabriolet and 1998 Mazda Bongo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…