DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi Cabriolet vs 1996 Nissan Largo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Largo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeNissan
CabrioletModelLargo
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
165 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,67 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4610 mm
1716 mmWidth1745 mm
1379 mmHeight1905 mm
1350 KgWeight1620 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi Cabriolet and 1996 Nissan Largo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Largo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…