1996 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.25/100
1996 Audi Cabriolet vs 1996 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi
Galant
Mitsubishi Galant 2.0 GLSI (E55A) 1996Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Galant
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
AudiMakeMitsubishi
CabrioletModelGalant
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
12,9 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
187 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
115 HPPower137 HP
165 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,7 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi CabrioletSpecificationMitsubishi Galant
4366 mmLength4620 mm
1716 mmWidth1730 mm
1379 mmHeight1395 mm
1350 KgWeight1291 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Audi Cabriolet and 1996 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…