DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi Cabriolet vs 1995 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeVolvo
CabrioletModelV40
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
187 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
115 HPPower140 HP
165 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,7 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4480 mm
1716 mmWidth1720 mm
1379 mmHeight1410 mm
1350 KgWeight1305 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi Cabriolet and 1995 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…