DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi Cabriolet vs 1995 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
CabrioletModelCronos
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
202 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4695 mm
1716 mmWidth1770 mm
1379 mmHeight1400 mm
1400 KgWeight1260 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi Cabriolet and 1995 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…