DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Audi Cabriolet vs 2001 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeFord
CabrioletModelContour
2001Model year2001
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1982 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
173 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4671 mm
1716 mmWidth1755 mm
1379 mmHeight1384 mm
1370 KgWeight1257 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Audi Cabriolet and 2001 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…