DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi Cabriolet vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
CabrioletModel323
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
195 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
125 HPPower130 HP
173 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
9 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4290 mm
1716 mmWidth1705 mm
1379 mmHeight1420 mm
1370 KgWeight1185 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi Cabriolet and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…