DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2025 Audi A8 vs 1978 Alpine A310 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 46.75 points.

94–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A8SpecificationAlpine A310
AudiMakeAlpine
A8ModelA310
2025Model year1978
SedanBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

Audi A8SpecificationAlpine A310
5,6 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement0 cc
340 HPPower150 HP
600 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A8SpecificationAlpine A310
DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A8SpecificationAlpine A310
4x4Drivetrain—
8Gears—
TiptronicTransmission—
18Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A8SpecificationAlpine A310
5302 mmLength—
1945 mmWidth—
1485 mmHeight—
1920 kgWeight—
505 ltLuggage capacity—

Additional Features

Audi A8Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistAuto HoldCruise ControlLane Keeping AssistCollision Avoidance SystemDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation
Alpine A310

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2025 Audi A8 and 1978 Alpine A310 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 46.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…