DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeOldsmobile
CutlassModelCutlass
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
5Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3350 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
213 HPPower213 HP
291 NmTorque291 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank63 lt
16 ltUrban consumption16 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R15 STyre size215/60 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4926 mmLength4926 mm
1805 mmWidth1805 mm
1389 mmHeight1389 mm
1697 KgWeight1697 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…