DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1999 Hyundai Centennial Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeHyundai
CutlassModelCentennial
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3350 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
213 HPPower210 HP
291 NmTorque314 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption16 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R15 STyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4926 mmLength5065 mm
1805 mmWidth1870 mm
1389 mmHeight1465 mm
1697 KgWeight1940 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1999 Hyundai Centennial approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…