DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1996 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeFord
CutlassModelMustang
1995Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,0 s
200 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3340 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
162 HPPower147 HP
251 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank58 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/75 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4610 mm
1700 mmWidth1823 mm
1330 mmHeight1341 mm
1200 KgWeight1472 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2553 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1996 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…