DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1998 Buick Skylark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeBuick
CutlassModelSkylark
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3135 ccEngine displacement3136 cc
141 HPPower158 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank58 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/75 R14Tyre size195/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength4805 mm
1805 mmWidth1732 mm
1350 mmHeight1360 mm
1445 KgWeight1345 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2627 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1998 Buick Skylark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…