DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1990 Nissan Maxima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeNissan
CutlassModelMaxima
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
185 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3135 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
141 HPPower170 HP
251 NmTorque248 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4921 mmLength4780 mm
1804 mmWidth1760 mm
1391 mmHeight1405 mm
1450 KgWeight1374 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1990 Nissan Maxima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…