DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1996 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeFord
CutlassModelEscort
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,1 s
190 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
162 HPPower220 HP
210 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
3Gears5
195/75 R14 STyre size225/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength4211 mm
1805 mmWidth1738 mm
1350 mmHeight1425 mm
1445 KgWeight1320 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2552 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1996 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…