DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1994 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeMazda
CutlassModelCronos
1994Model year1994
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
162 HPPower160 HP
210 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
195/75 R14 STyre size195/65 R14 89 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength4695 mm
1805 mmWidth1770 mm
1350 mmHeight1400 mm
1445 KgWeight1220 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1994 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…