DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1995 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeAudi
CutlassModelA6
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2190 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
122 HPPower115 HP
176 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
185/75 R14Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4834 mmLength4797 mm
1766 mmWidth1783 mm
1375 mmHeight1430 mm
1334 KgWeight1355 Kg
2664 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1995 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…