DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Oldsmobile Aurora vs 2004 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeNissan
AuroraModelPathfinder
2003Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed164 km/h
3473 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
218 HPPower243 HP
312 NmTorque359 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5060 mmLength4640 mm
1850 mmWidth1820 mm
1440 mmHeight1800 mm
1645 KgWeight1990 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Oldsmobile Aurora and 2004 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…