DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Oldsmobile Aurora vs 2001 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeOpel
AuroraModelOmega
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3473 ccEngine displacement3175 cc
218 HPPower218 HP
312 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

5060 mmLength4898 mm
1850 mmWidth1776 mm
1440 mmHeight1455 mm
1645 KgWeight1710 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Oldsmobile Aurora and 2001 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…