DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 O.S.C.A. 2500 GT vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

O,S.C.A.MakeAlfa Romeo
2500 GTModel156
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
220 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
190 HPPower190 HP
235 NmTorque222 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
13 ltUrban consumption16,5 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4090 mmLength4430 mm
1760 mmWidth1745 mm
1150 mmHeight1415 mm
680 KgWeight1320 Kg
2350 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 O.S.C.A. 2500 GT and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…