DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan X-Trail vs 2010 Ford S-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
X-TrailModelS-Max
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
194 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
169 HPPower161 HP
233 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4630 mmLength4768 mm
1785 mmWidth1884 mm
1685 mmHeight1658 mm
1469 KgWeight1605 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan X-Trail and 2010 Ford S-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…