DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan X-Trail vs 2004 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
X-TrailModelFocus
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
180 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
136 HPPower147 HP
314 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank53 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/70 R15; 215/65 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4455 mmLength4450 mm
1765 mmWidth1699 mm
1675 mmHeight1430 mm
1525 KgWeight1315 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan X-Trail and 2004 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…