DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Nissan X-Trail vs 2008 Mazda MX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
X-TrailModelMX-5
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
173 HPPower167 HP
320 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size"205/45 ZR17 84 W "
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4630 mmLength3995 mm
1785 mmWidth1720 mm
1685 mmHeight1245 mm
1651 KgWeight1146 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Nissan X-Trail and 2008 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…