2011 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.0 dCi (150 Hp) 2011Overall Score65.5/100
2011 Nissan X-Trail vs 2011 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2011Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Nissan X-Trail
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo S40
NissanMakeVolvo
X-TrailModelS40
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo S40
11,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo S40
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo S40
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo S40
4635 mmLength4476 mm
1790 mmWidth1770 mm
1700 mmHeight1454 mm
1605 KgWeight1498 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Nissan X-Trail and 2011 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…