DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan X-Trail vs 2002 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
X-TrailModelMondeo
2002Model year2002
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower90 HP
192 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
12 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4731 mm
1765 mmWidth1812 mm
1675 mmHeight1429 mm
1445 KgWeight1492 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan X-Trail and 2002 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…