DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan X-Terra vs 2003 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Terra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeBMW
X-TerraModelX5
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,3 s
210 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
210 HPPower231 HP
313 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank92 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption17,8 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
—Average consumption12,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R15Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4666 mm
1790 mmWidth1872 mm
1860 mmHeight1717 mm
1900 KgWeight1990 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan X-Terra and 2003 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Terra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…