2002 • Nissan
Wingroad
Nissan Wingroad 2.0 i 16V (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
2002 Nissan Wingroad vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 T (205 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Wingroad
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan WingroadSpecificationSaab 9-3
NissanMakeSaab
WingroadModel9-3
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Nissan WingroadSpecificationSaab 9-3
—0–100 km/h7,3 s
180 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
150 HPPower205 HP
200 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan WingroadSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan WingroadSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan WingroadSpecificationSaab 9-3
4410 mmLength4629 mm
1695 mmWidth1711 mm
1500 mmHeight1423 mm
1270 KgWeight1400 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Wingroad and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Wingroad leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…