DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan Terrano vs 1996 Opel Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
TerranoModelFrontera
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

19,0 s0–100 km/h18,6 s
145 km/hTop speed153 km/h
2663 ccEngine displacement2410 cc
100 HPPower125 HP
221 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15 STyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4692 mm
1735 mmWidth1764 mm
1810 mmHeight1753 mm
1850 KgWeight—
2650 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan Terrano and 1996 Opel Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…