DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Terrano vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeGAZ
TerranoModel31
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

15,7 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
155 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2663 ccEngine displacement2287 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
278 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4185 mmLength4960 mm
1755 mmWidth1800 mm
1830 mmHeight1422 mm
1745 KgWeight1450 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Terrano and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…