DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Sentra vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Sentra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLand Rover
SentraModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
200 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2489 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower177 HP
244 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
—Average consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size195/80 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4509 mmLength4445 mm
1710 mmWidth1809 mm
1410 mmHeight1708 mm
1268 KgWeight1620 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Sentra and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Sentra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…