1999 • Nissan
Sentra
Nissan Sentra 1.6i 16V (107 Hp) 1999Overall Score53.25/100
1999 Nissan Sentra vs 2000 Acura EL Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Acura
EL
Acura EL 1.6 i 16V (107 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Acura EL
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan SentraSpecificationAcura EL
NissanMakeAcura
SentraModelEL
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan SentraSpecificationAcura EL
10,9 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
191 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
107 HPPower107 HP
150 NmTorque139 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan SentraSpecificationAcura EL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan SentraSpecificationAcura EL
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan SentraSpecificationAcura EL
4230 mmLength4480 mm
1670 mmWidth1705 mm
1395 mmHeight1395 mm
1064 KgWeight1145 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Sentra and 2000 Acura EL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Acura EL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…