2000 • Nissan
Safari
Nissan Safari 4.5 i (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Nissan Safari vs 1999 Ford Expedition Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Expedition
Ford Expedition 4.6 i V8 16V XLT (243 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Safari
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan SafariSpecificationFord Expedition
NissanMakeFord
SafariModelExpedition
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan SafariSpecificationFord Expedition
13,7 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
160 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4479 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
200 HPPower243 HP
348 NmTorque397 Nm
6Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan SafariSpecificationFord Expedition
PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank98 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan SafariSpecificationFord Expedition
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R16Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan SafariSpecificationFord Expedition
4910 mmLength5197 mm
1930 mmWidth1996 mm
1865 mmHeight1887 mm
2190 KgWeight2280 Kg
2970 mmWheelbase3025 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Safari and 1999 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Safari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…