DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Nissan Safari vs 1997 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Safari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
SafariModelThunderbird
1997Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4479 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
200 HPPower208 HP
348 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank72 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption19 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R16Tyre size225/50/R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4910 mmLength5088 mm
1930 mmWidth1847 mm
1865 mmHeight1333 mm
2190 KgWeight1687 Kg
2970 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Nissan Safari and 1997 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Safari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…