DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan Rogue vs 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Rogue

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
RogueModelOutlander
2016Model year2016
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
170 HPPower150 HP
237 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
CVTCSGears6
225/60 R17 106HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4630 mmLength4695 mm
1839 mmWidth1810 mm
1684 mmHeight1680 mm
1602 KgWeight1600 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan Rogue and 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Rogue leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…