DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Rogue vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Rogue

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJeep
RogueModelCompass
2012Model year2012
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,90 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
170 HPPower163 HP
237 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
CVTGears6
215/70 R16; 225/60 R17; 225/55 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4656 mmLength4448 mm
1801 mmWidth1812 mm
1684 mmHeight1718 mm
1563-1578 KgWeight1680 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Rogue and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Rogue leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…